Big tech accountability? Read how we got here in  The Closing of the Net 

ETNO calls for an open and transparent ACTA process. Concerns relate to disproportionate measures, freedom of expression, privacy and an Open Internet.


ETNO, the organisation which represents Europe's largest telecommunications companies*, has weighed in publicly to the debate surrounding the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement, known as ACTA. The ACTA is known to contain measures for copyright enforcement on the Internet - measures which include network filtering and 3-strikes. The measures could also target ecommerce companies such as eBay.


ETNO is concerned that the ACTA** is being negotiated behind closed doors and is calling on Members of the European Parliament to raise

the issue publicly with the aim of opening up the process.  It wants to see this happen before the ACTA negotiations are concluded, which could be as soon as this coming  January.


ETNO's concern are that ACTA does not distinguish between counterfeiting and piracy, which are two entirely different issues. It is also worried that the ACTA will have a disproportionate effect on hi-tech industries, with resulting increases in costs for businesses and consumers.


It further expresses concern at the attack on the ‘mere conduit' principle which underpins EU telecoms law, and has the de facto effect of protecting democratic speech and the open Internet. Imposing network filtering onto network operators to enforce copyright, represents  a threat to fundamental rights of EU citizens.


There could be some interesting politics behind this. Perhaps the real point is not that ACTA is being negotiated behind closed doors, but that it is in  rooms where ETNO members are not permitted to enter. And yet, political decisions  are being taken in those rooms  with serious implications for  its members' businesses.


And ETNO's comments may seem somewhat disingenuous, given that two of its members lobbied hard in the Telecoms Package to be permitted to restrict users' access to Internet services and applications.


My feeling is that within ETNO there are divergent opinions, as there are within all telcos. Their problem is that they want it both ways.  ETNO has quietly behind the scenes opposed graduated response and copyright measures in the Telecoms Package.


In the ACTA situation, ETNO has come out on the side of the angels. On the other hand,  for a £260 billion  organisation,  an ‘expert contribution' on a website amounts to  little more than wagging its finger at the EU.


ACTA is forcing Europe's  telcos  to take a difficult decision. The very heart of their  business is being dictated to and threatened by another industry, which sees only one issue. They can no longer have it both ways and will have to fight hard and fast. ETNO  will need to do  more than a bit of expert finger-wagging if it is to win any victories.


*ETNO members include BT, Deutsche Telekom, France Telecom, Telefonica, Telecom Italia. It claims to represent £264 billion in annual revenue to the European economy.


**ACTA is the Acnti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement being discussed secretly between trade representatives of the US, the EU, Japan, Canada, Australia and other governments. As a "trade agreement" it  sits in a legal hierarchy above EU and national law and this is a key reason why it is of concern. Decision made in ACTA could be forced onto the EU and governments without the European or national parliaments having any say in it.

Details of ACTA have leaked, and they are known to include Internet copyright enforcement measures such as 3-strikes, and secondary liability for ISPs.


Read ETNO's 'expert contribution' on ACTA


EU DG Trade comments on ACTA

ACTA Analysis by FFII



This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009) Europe's telcos call to open up ACTA 18 December  2009.


Iptegrity in brief is the website of Dr Monica Horten. I’ve been analysing analysing digital policy since 2008. Way back then, I identified how issues around rights can influence Internet policy, and that has been a thread throughout all of my research. I hold a PhD in EU Communications Policy from the University of Westminster (2010), and a Post-graduate diploma in marketing.   I’ve served as an independent expert on the Council of Europe  Committee on Internet Freedoms, and was involved in a capacity building project in Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine. I am currently (from June 2022)  Policy Manager - Freedom of Expression, with the Open Rights Group. For more, see About Iptegrity is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes


States v the 'Net? 

Read The Closing of the Net, by me, Monica Horten.

"original and valuable"  Times higher Education

" essential read for anyone interested in understanding the forces at play behind the web."

Find out more about the book here  The Closing of the Net


FROM £15.99

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

In 2012, I presented my PhD research in the European Parliament.

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review


Don't miss Iptegrity!  RSS/ Bookmark