Tech policy & human rights
Big tech accountability? Read how we got here in The Closing of the Net
ACTA negotiators are not able to reach a conclusion yet on ISP liability.
The latest round of talks on the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement ( ACTA) were not able to come to any conclusion on Internet and online copyright, according to new leaked briefing from DG Trade.
The talks took place in Mexico from 26-29 January, the latest in almost two years of secret proposals to set up (among other things) a global regime for enforcement of copyright in respect of the Internet and peer-to-peer filesharing. DG Trade of the European Commission is negotiating on behalf of the EU, even though it has not yet briefed the European Parliament.
What is interesting about this DG Trade briefing is not what is says, but what it does not say. Cross-referencing it against
an earlier briefing which details the ACTA Internet Chapter, we can learn that they did discuss ISP liability – possibly at some length, given that they ran out of time (Point 3). ISP liability, means that the broadband providers will be made liable for copyrighted content which is transmitted by users on their networks. It is a step in setting up a graduated response/3-strikes system.
They did not have time to discuss anti-circumvention measures – that is, ways to defeat new technical tools which can break their digital locks.
They also say they could not make progress due to a need for ‘clarification of different technical concepts’ and the US and the EU will present ‘their own systems’ next time.
It is not clear whether the technical concepts refers to ISP liability or to anti-circumvention. If it means ISP liability, then do we assume the EU representatives will be giving their fellow copyright warriors a briefing on mere conduit?
Their cavalier attitude to citizens concerns is also notable (See point 4). It may not say 3-strikes, but if it has ISP liability, it has 3-strikes by another name.
European Commission - DG Trade Latest briefing on the ACTA talks in Mexico January 2010
DG Official Press Release on ACTA Mexico talks
Netzpolitik report on the ACTA Mexico talks and the DG Trade briefing
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) New EU briefing: ACTA Internet discussions ‘inconclusive’ http://www.iptegrity.com 17 February 2010
Online Safety Bill: latest
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- £2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill
- Online Safety Bill: Ministers to get unprecedented powers over speech
- What's the point of the Online Safety Bill?
IPtegrity commentary
- UK bulk intercept surveillance - court ruling calls for tighter safeguards
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- Oversight Board Decision moves Facebook into human rights ambit
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
- What? Will UK government ignore security as it walks away from EU?
- Britain unplugged: the security risk of no-deal
- Betting on a costly space race: MPs probe OneWeb satellite deal
- Disrupting supply chains: how leaving the Single Market means systemic breakdown
- Big tech and anti-trust: an ill-fitting suit?
- Schrems ruling puts a spoke in UK data flows from 2021
- Russia Report: how to balance social media and national security?
- Digital rights - why they matter in a time of coronavirus
- EU upload filter - Germany’s crucial deciding vote
- Copyright Directive upload filter - why EU Council should block it
- Data and Brexit – a mis-calculation?
- EU lawmakers seek to protect free speech in online content rules
- How Brexit rips up business models Part 2: visas for money and music
Published work
- Algorithms Patrolling Content: Where’s the Harm?
- Content responsibility: The looming cloud of uncertainty for Internet intermediaries
- Freedom of Expression, Human Rights Standards and Private Online Censorship
- The Policy Challenge Of Content Restrictions: How Private Actors Engage The Duties Of States
- Internet Policy Review - The Aereo dilemma and copyright in the cloud
My Linked In profileIptegrity in brief
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten. I’ve been analysing analysing digital policy since 2008. Way back then, I identified how issues around rights can influence Internet policy, and that has been a thread throughout all of my research. I hold a PhD in EU Communications Policy from the University of Westminster (2010), and a Post-graduate diploma in marketing. I’ve served as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on Internet Freedoms, and was involved in a capacity building project in Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine. I am currently (from June 2022) Policy Manager - Freedom of Expression, with the Open Rights Group. For more, see About Iptegrity
Speaking engagements
Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.
Contact me to use iptegrity content for commercial purposes
States v the 'Net?
Read The Closing of the Net, by me, Monica Horten.
"original and valuable" Times higher Education
" essential read for anyone interested in understanding the forces at play behind the web." ITSecurity.co.uk
Find out more about the book here The Closing of the Net
FROM £15.99
In 2012, I presented my PhD research in the European Parliament.
The politics of copyright
A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
