Platform responsibility? Get the backstory - check my book The Closing of the Net - only £15.99!

The European Commission  invites lobbyists to a meeting on ACTA. Meanwhile,  the Internet service providers finally step out in opposition, so the meeting could be interesting. 


The European  Commission has announced a public 'stakeholders' meeting on ACTA (Anti-counterfeiting trade agreement) in March. Whilst this has the veneer of a consultation, it is in fact, not 

 so open as it might seem. In my experience, there is plenty of room for manipulation of these meetings, and it is to be expected that the speakers will be limited in what they can say, especially those who oppose ACTA.

It should be noted too, that this is not the Parliament. This is a lobbyists meeting at the Commission.

The call yesterday for transparency for the Parliament is more important, because the Parliament  should have  oversight of anything which will have legislative implications for Europe. 

Meanwhile EuroISPA   has spoken out against ACTA, joining its fellow trade association, ETNO in opposing the moves on ISP liability and requests to sanction users by suspension and disconnection of access.

In a statement, EuroISPA calls again on European institutions to ensure that no measures could be proposed that could lead to graduated response, criminal sanctions, US-style notice and take down and, indirectly, generalised monitoring of Internet traffic and service.

EuroISPA reminds the Commission to respect the acquis communitaire for telecommunications, as amended only last year in the Telecoms Package, and in particular, of the final agreement on Amendment 138. 


Details of the ACTA Stakeholders Consultation Meeting 

Date: Monday 22nd March 2010

Time: 10.00 – 12:30 Location: Charlemagne Building, Room Alcide de Gaspieri - Rue de la Loi, 170 B-1049 Brussels


To register for the meeting, and for more information, go to DG Trade website ACTA - Stakeholders Consultation Meeting 


**Michael Geist has another leaked document which seems to show that several EU Member States, including Denmark and Germany, are opposed to the public release of ACTA documents. 


This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten  (2010) EU Commission public meeting on ACTA 25 February 2010 



States v the 'Net? 

Read The Closing of the Net, by me, Monica Horten.

"original and valuable"  Times higher Education

" essential read for anyone interested in understanding the forces at play behind the web."

Find out more about the book here  The Closing of the Net


FROM £15.99

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

In 2012, I presented my PhD research in the European Parliament.

Don't miss Iptegrity!  RSS/ Bookmark is the website of Dr Monica Horten. She is a policy analyst specialising in Internet governance & European policy, including platform accountability. She is a published author & Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She served as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on  Internet Freedom. She has worked on CoE, EU and UNDP funded projects in eastern Europe and the Caucasus. In a voluntary capacity, she has led UK citizen delegations to the European Parliament. She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012.

Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy (and related issues on Brexit). Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review