The Closing of the Net  "original and valuable"  Times Higher Education

The European Commission has made the first public admission that the Telecoms Package is part of the legal framework for IP enforcement. What does it mean for ACTA?


Regular readers of will know that for the past two years   I have consistently argued that the Telecoms Package contained provisions for copyright enforcement.

A similar analysis was made by others, including  the citizens group La Quadrature du Net, who campaigned against the Telecoms Package.

 During the passage of the Telecoms Package in the European Parliament, there were denials, lies, and cover-ups - or just plain

silence. Citizen campaigners were accused of  "scare-mongering". The provisions themselves were written in obscure text and tucked into places where they were not expected to be.  The EU powers-that-be did not want the truth of what they were doing exposed. The aim was to raise doubts, and soften the opposition.


We can see the results in the UK's Digital Economy Act, and the French Hadopi law.


Now, in a press release from DG Trade on the almost "final" version of ACTA (note that  some important points have NOT been agreed) the European Commission sets out the IP enforcement legal framework for Europe. Last but not least on its list of directives, is the Telecoms Package - the Universal Services and Users Rights directive, and the Framework directive: 


European IPR enforcement legislation includes the:

- Enforcement of IPR Directive;

- IPR Customs Regulation

- Copyright in the Information Society Directive

- E-commerce Directive

- Data Protection Directives

- Telecom Reform package of 2009, including the regulatory framework forelectronic communications.



We face a similar situation with ACTA. Tucked away in obsure texts, are some quite damaging provisions which the European Commission is trying to cover up. (See also my previous articles with analysis).


At least, with the Telecoms Package, legislators had some opportunity to build in safeguards against abusive practices, and the outcome is Article 1.3a of the Framework directive. Whilst it may not be as comprehensive as might have been wished, at least it is there. It is an instruction that  due process  - a prior, fair and impartial hearing - must be followed in all cases where Internet users are to be sanctioned for copyright infringement.


In ACTA, there is no "Article 1.3a".  And therefore no safeguard against privately operated justice.


In a strange sort of way, we must thank the team at DG Trade for clarifying the position of the Telecoms Package under Europe's IP enforcement framework - but there is a need to be ever-vigilant against their too-ready accedence to ACTA.  

And the ongoing attempts to deny, lie, and cover-up.



 DG Trade press release on ACTA October 2010

 For the full story of the Telecoms Package, see my book The Copyright Enforcement Enigma: Internet politics and the Telecoms Package

Flattr this 


This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009) EU admits  -  Telecoms Package is copyright law 23 October  2010 . 







The Copyright Enforcement Enigma tells the story of the 2009 Telecoms Package and how the copyright industries tried to hijack it.

'accurate and absorbing account of the story of the Telecoms Package' -Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology

'...a must read for those interested in knowing in depth about copyright enforcement and Internet.' -Journal of Intellectual Property Rights.  

Read more  

Ask your library to get it!

Order direct from the publisher.

Go to   Amazon

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

European Parliament launch for Copyright Enforcement Enigma

Don't miss Iptegrity!  RSS/ Bookmark is the website of Dr Monica Horten, European expert on Internet policy and Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She is an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on Cross-border flow of Internet traffic and Internet freedom (MSI-INT). She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012. Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy. Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review

Paperback and Kindle and Epub formats.

Available from all good online bookstores or get it from the publisher Zed Books  direct:

Amazon UK

Amazon USA