Looking for help with the Online Safety Act - Ofcom consultations? Please get in touch. 

And will the Parliament become the Commission's poodle? One thing is clear, those who stand to lose the most if Brussels gets it wrong, are European citizens.


The European Parliament will vote tomorrow on a resolution concerning ACTA. It is almost impossible  to unravel the politics that is going on as Brussels struggles to decide what to do.

Tomorrow's vote on a resolution is not legislative. Nor is it finally decisive. But it is an important part of the European Parliament's decision-making process, in that it could determine whether or not the Parliament will ultimately be persuaded to accept ACTA.

After a couple of weeks of internal negotiations, in which attempts were made to produce a single, agreed resolution across all party groups including the EPP and ECR groups, there are now two different resolutions on the table.   The two

resolutions are quite different, and the choice to be made by the European Parliament is a significant one.


One   resolution is a  joint agreement between  the Socialists, Liberals, Left and Green groups. Missing only are the Independents (which include UKIP) and the non-aligned members.


And the EPP has joined forces with the ECR group which includes the current UK Conservatives  who are part of the ruling coalition, to produce  the other  resolution.


The joint Socialist-Liberal-Green-Left groups essentially call on the Commission to come clean on  ACTA, and  to clarify the meaning of those elements in the text which stand to do most harm to the Internet. Their concerns include that ACTA goes beyond the EU acquis, and that ‘commercial scale' may be interpreted in a way which would impose criminal  liability on EU citizens. Moreover, they are concerned at the possible interpretation of ‘co-operative efforts' and whether or not there are implications for the liability of Internet intermediaries, something which is by no means clear.


The EPP resolution by contrast, is one which ultimately will support those industries which have lobbied for ACTA, and it  turns  the European Parliament into the Commission's poodle. This is a very weak position indeed, for the post-Lisbon Parliament.


It also creates a real threat to the Internet and to users. The  EPP resolution contains language about ‘the fight against piracy' and is clear that its objective is to protect rights-holders not Internet users. The EPP/ECR resolution supports the Commission, irrespective of whether it has conducted itself in a manner worthy of the Guardian of the Treaties.  For example, ‘as the Commission has stated' -as if the European Parliament had no role to probe a statement by the Commission and must accept it as truth. 


In particular, as noted by La Quadrature du Net , the EPP/ECR  resolution  puts pressure on Internet Service Providers in order establish extra-judicial copyright enforcement in the digital environment.  In this way, it  threatens the fundamental freedoms of Internet users.


Such a  possibility of an extra-judicial enforcement was debated during the Telecoms Package process, and opposed by the European Parliament. It is therefore incumbent on the European Parliament to support EU law as it has previously voted for.


La Quadrature du Net  further highlights how the EPP resolution  paves the way for the criminalization of non-commercial infringement of copyright, patent and trademarks, and that it

fails to recognize how  ACTA  circumvents the  competent international organizations like WIPO or WTO.


The FFII, in a letter to MEPs, expressed further concerns  that ACTA is out of line with the EU acquis, and highlighted examples.


It is particularly shameful that the ECR has backed the EPP  resolution. Its action could reflect the  UK Conservatives  - part of the ruling coalition government - continuing to doff their cap to big industry, as we saw in the Telecoms Package.


Where the government at home is positioning itself as listening to citizens, its representatives in the European Parliament continue to work against the interests of citizens.


Because EU citizens will be the ones to lose out if ACTA is simply acceded to.


The issue for the European Parliament tomorrow is whether it will stand up for citizens' rights - as it has done previously - or whether it will take the first step to giving away those rights to a shady international so-called agreement.


Draft Common Motion for a Joint Resolution on ACTA


EPP/ECR Resolution on ACTA 



This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) Will Internet users  be the  losers in Europe's  ACTA battle?, http://www.iptegrity.com 23  November 2010. 



Iptegrity moves on!

May 2024: Iptegrity is being re-developed to upgrade the Joomla software.

Please bear with us until the new site is ready.

Find me on LinkedIn

About Iptegrity

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten. I am an  independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. In April 2024, I was appointed as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. I am a published author, and post-doctoral scholar. I hold a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. I cover the UK and EU. I'm a former tech journalist, and an experienced panelist and Chair. My media credits include the BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for non-commercial use. Please link back and attribute Dr Monica Horten.  Contact me to use any of my content for commercial purposes.  

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review