Big tech accountability? Read how we got here in  The Closing of the Net 

The Brussels rumour mill is hinting that the Civil Liberties committee of the European Parliament is being asked to write an Opinion on the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).  It is understood that a request has gone in to the co-ordinators of the civil liberties committee, who will take the decision at a meeting – held in camera – tomorrow evening.

The Opinion would contribute to  the processing of ACTA in the European Parliament, and has

the potential to help the Parliament understand the civil liberties issues which arise out of ACTA.  In particular, it would give the Parliament its own internal tool to examine whether or not fundamental rights are infringed.

 The European  Parliament will have to decide whether or not to give its consent to ACTA. It is questionable whether the European Commission or the Council can sign ACTA until the Parliament's consent is obtained, which is why this is important. See Commission confirms it will not sign ACTA yet

Although ACTA is not legislation, the matter of consent will follow a similar process to legislation. That  process  is just  beginning. 

 So far, the Trade committee has been appointed as  the lead committee, and  the Legal Affairs committee has announced it will write an Opinion, as has  the Development committee.

 A Civil Liberties committee opinion  would focus specifically on the fundamental rights issues, and could give MEPs an opportunity to distill their own conclusions on this very difficult issue. 

 Pressure is also being put on the Industry committee to contribute an opinion. The industry committee is responsible for telecommunications regulation, and ACTA does contain provisions which will impose liabilities onto ISPs,  There is therefore, a strong argument for the Industry committee to also issue an opinion.

There are now a handful of reports  which  suggest that legal problems exist with ACTA, specifically concerning the EU legal framework ,  civil liberties and fundamental rights.

 In particular, one report that was written proactively by a coalition of  academic  ‘legal eagles’, concludes  that ACTA will push the envelope of the EU acquis communitaire just a little too far.

 Another report,  written by a law professor and commissioned  by the Green group,   concludes that  there are risks in ACTA for fundamental rights. 

Such reports   are typical of barristers’ opinions, and hardly make light bedtime reading.  On the other hand, they are trying to tell the Parliament about potential pitfalls which an international agreement which – whilst it will not itself become law – will be used to  guide European lawmaking and may force changes to the acquis  which are not to the benefit of European citizens.

Surely, it is the Parliament’s duty to listen?


 La Quadrature du Net is asking citizens to write to their MEP and to the two committees.

If you want to know more about the connection between copyright and telecoms legislation, see my book

The Copyright Enforcement Enigma: Internet Politics and the 'Telecoms Package' 

  Please attribute this article: Monica Horten (2011) ACTA : does the EU need a civil liberties opinion?  16 October 2011.


States v the 'Net? 

Read The Closing of the Net, by me, Monica Horten.

"original and valuable"  Times higher Education

" essential read for anyone interested in understanding the forces at play behind the web."

Find out more about the book here  The Closing of the Net


FROM £15.99

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

In 2012, I presented my PhD research in the European Parliament.

Don't miss Iptegrity!  RSS/ Bookmark is the website of Dr Monica Horten. She is a policy analyst specialising in Internet governance & European policy, including platform accountability. She is a published author & Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She served as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on  Internet Freedom. She has worked on CoE, EU and UNDP funded projects in eastern Europe and the Caucasus. In a voluntary capacity, she has led UK citizen delegations to the European Parliament. She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012.

Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy (and related issues on Brexit). Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review