The Closing of the Net  "original and valuable"  Times Higher Education

ACTA  secrecy continues in the European Parliament. Next week, the Trade (INTA) committee will meet to hear the presentation of an   opinion on ACTA from the European Parliament’s own internal legal services.  The INTA committee has refused requests from campaigning groups to release the opinion, raising fears that it will support an official view of ACTA, and fail to address what are now becoming well-known non-compliance problems raised by this secretly-negotiated copyright enforcement treaty.

The INTA committee meeting on ACTA (Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement) will be held next Wedneday 23 November. The European Parliament Legal Service will present to the committee its considered opinion on ACTA, which has been prepared at the request of the INTA co-ordinators. But the presentation  will be   ‘in camera’. That means behind closed doors, in secrecy. The MEPs on the INTA committee will be bound by confidentiality agreements not to divulge what they hear.

 One of the  roles of the European Parliament’s legal services is to defend the Parliament’s position when it is challenged. It also does provide advice on tricky  aspects of law and policy. Given the high level of controversy over ACTA  non-compliance with the EU acquis communitaire, the position taken by the legal services will be important. It is therefore a critical  that the legal services opinion is examined in public.

The Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) has been campaigning for the release of the legal opinion, but has been refused. They wrote to the INTA committee chairman, Vital Moreira with a specific request. In his reply  stated, Mr Moreira stated:

“the opinion of the Legal Service is, for the time being, a confidential  document; therefore its presentation is foreseen to take place in an “in camera” part  of the Committee meeting.”

He also implied that there is a public interest reason for witholding the opinion – this does seem a little difficult to justify. The full text of the FFII request to the INTA committee and the response is here.

However,  the INTA committee chairman   has revealed  there is an ACTA workshop planned for   March next year. He has also indicated  that  there will be an exchange of views on ACTA which the public may attend, although he gave no  date for it.

 This whole episode gives me a strange sense of déjà vu. There was a similar situation in the Telecoms Package 3rd Reading where there was an attempt to withold  a legal opinion.Will EU lawyers white-out Amendment 138? In that instance, the opinion  somehow emerged into the public domain.

 As a serious comment, I would say that the legal opinion was very helpful in providing an understanding  of the problem which the Parliament was facing at the time. An account of the 3rd Reading  is provided in my book The Copyright Enforcement Enigma

 The INTA committee would be well  advised to stop the cloak-and-dagger behaviour, and simply release the legal opinion.

 Please cite Monica Horten, ACTA ‘in camera’ – the legal opinion they don’t want you to see, www.iptegrity.com, 16 November 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Copyright Enforcement Enigma tells the story of the 2009 Telecoms Package and how the copyright industries tried to hijack it.

'accurate and absorbing account of the story of the Telecoms Package' -Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology

'...a must read for those interested in knowing in depth about copyright enforcement and Internet.' -Journal of Intellectual Property Rights.  

Read more  

Ask your library to get it!

Order direct from the publisher.

Go to   Amazon

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

European Parliament launch for Copyright Enforcement Enigma

Don't miss Iptegrity! Iptegrity.com  RSS/ Bookmark      

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, European expert on Internet policy and Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She is an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on Cross-border flow of Internet traffic and Internet freedom (MSI-INT). She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012. Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy. Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review

Paperback and Kindle and Epub formats.

Available from all good online bookstores or get it from the publisher Zed Books  direct:

Amazon UK

Amazon USA