ACTA's predecessor - read all about it!

The Copyright Enforcement Enigma jacket

The first time the European Parliament looked at Internet copyright was in the Telecoms Package.  The Copyright Enforcement Enigma introduces you to this topic. In the context of the history of copyright and  3-strikes,  it unravels the strange story of how copyright got mixed up in the Telecoms Package and Amendment 138. When you finish it, you will understand why the ISPs and fundamental rights are under attack!  Click here  to get it!

 Haddock, whiting, hake, Norwegian lobster….  What do these  harmless marine creatures   have to do with Internet copyright?

 The EU Council of Ministers  yesterday gave the go-ahead for the EU to sign the controversial Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). ACTA is effectively an international copyright treaty, paving the way for a range of Internet blocking measures against allegedly infringing material online.  The green light was given  - not by the Ministers responsible for copyright – but by those in charge of fishing fleets.

 

The decision for signing ACTA was deemed an ‘A’ point, meaning that it had been pre-agreed. It was therefore put to the next available meeting, which happened to be  the Fisheries Council. At this Fisheries Council meeting,  fishing quotas were the hotly disputed matter. The ACTA authorisation was slipped  in unnoticed beneath the never-ending  fight   between the British and the Spanish over how much cod  they can net.

The Council’s press release was notably bland: 

 The Council adopted a decision authorising the signing of an anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (ACTA) with Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the United States.

 But it  also  contained some fishy language, claiming that ACTA is only intended for “ actions against large-scale infringements of intellectual property.  Those words can be read two ways. To address a single infringer who has a large-scale operation. Or to address infringements which multiply on a large scale – namely the millions of small infringements, such as those  allegedly taking place over file-sharing networks.

 The Council decision document  contained  a get-out clause on criminal measures. The Council is not authorising the EU signatories to accede to the criminal measures in ACTA – that will be left  to the Member States to individually sign.

This is not however, the end of the matter. The European Parliament must give its consent before ACTA can be signed  by the EU.  The Parliament’s consent is still pending and not expected before March next year.  

 

PS. I also noted that the Fisheries Council sneaked in the authorisation of four varieties of GM food … hmmmmmm?

 

You are free to re-publish this article under a non-commercial Creative Commons licence, but you must attibute the author and put a link back to iptegrity.com. Academics – please cite this article as Monica Horten, EU Council gives fishy go-ahead for ACTAwww.iptegrity.com, 16 December 2011 . Commercial users – please contact the author.

Text Size

Don't miss Iptegrity.com

Iptegrity.com Keep up to date - RSS feed  & Live Bookmark! 

Re-set old RSS feeds & links

Iptegrity.com is made available under a Creative Commons licence - non-commercial use, attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.
Please contact me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes.

ACTA -& the Telecoms Package

Available via Amazon & online bookstores worldwide:

Citizens' groups

European Digital Rights ( EDRi)

AK Vorrat