Platform responsibility? Get the backstory - check my book The Closing of the Net - only £15.99!

Cables from US Embassies in Japan and Europe, leaked to  the Wikileaks website, show how the US government set about creating an ‘ACTA'.  They expose ACTA as an instrument of US foreign policy. It's arguable that the European Union was merely a puppet.


The cables, discovered by La Quadrature du Net,  discuss how ACTA was born out of conversations between Stanford McCoy, then head of the US Trade Representative, and various representatives of the Japanese government, including the head of Japan's intellectual property office. The EU was one of a list of possible ‘preferential partners' for the agreement.


The Japanese informed the US Embassy correspondent that ‘the intent of

the agreement is to address the IPR problems of third nations such as China, Russia and Brazil, and not to negotiate  the different interests of like-minded countries".  In particular, it was to send a message to China.


The cable correspondent  reveals how the US and Japan agreed to use the message of protecting consumers and health as a means to make the proposed ACTA  politically acceptable.  They  tell us how the USTR Stan McCoy persuaded the Japanese to keep this as a separate initiative  from other existing global organisations, such as the OECD.


Japan and the US agreed to try to push ACTA through with a minimum of scrutiny, and were not keen to address issues that, for example, were important to the European Union, such as geographic indicators. They said that such discussions would slow the process down.


Officials from Japan and the US discussed how they could best manipulate the European Union - was it better to get the Commission involved, or to go direct to the Member States?  The latter might be slower, they felt.


And we  learn that ACTA was always understood by the US to be more than just  a trade agreement. One US official is quoted as saying that ACTA also involves (in addition to trade) "intellectual property rights, customs, law enforcement and judicial issues".


As those who followed the Telecoms Package will know, judicial issues are an important aspect of copyright enforcement  measures such as graduated response.  


Flattr this 

La Quadrature du Net  have further analysis of the ACTA cables.



 This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2011) Cables reveal how US gov't cooked up ACTA 4 March  2011



States v the 'Net? 

Read The Closing of the Net, by me, Monica Horten.

"original and valuable"  Times higher Education

" essential read for anyone interested in understanding the forces at play behind the web."

Find out more about the book here  The Closing of the Net


FROM £15.99

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

In 2012, I presented my PhD research in the European Parliament.

Don't miss Iptegrity!  RSS/ Bookmark is the website of Dr Monica Horten. She is a policy analyst specialising in Internet governance & European policy, including platform accountability. She is a published author & Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She served as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on  Internet Freedom. She has worked on CoE, EU and UNDP funded projects in eastern Europe and the Caucasus. In a voluntary capacity, she has led UK citizen delegations to the European Parliament. She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012.

Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy (and related issues on Brexit). Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review