The Closing of the Net  "original and valuable"  Times Higher Education

The EU mandate for the TTIP trade talks with the US indicates that  ‘issues related to intellectual property right’s (IPR)  will form part of the discussions.  The bureacrats in charge of the talks have managed to draft  a text that looks quite benign, designed to fool the politicians and the uninitiated. But when decoded,  it would seem to amount to the same old enforcement agenda.

 The  mandate specifies  that the intellectual property  discussion  will address ‘areas most relevant for fostering exchange of goods and services with IP content, with a view to reducing costs and supporting innovation’.

 This language sounds harmless enough, it  never mentions enforcement, and says nothing about 3 strikes or web blocking. Indeed it is so vague that we may almost dismiss it as meaningless bureaucratic garbage. But I  think we do so at our peril. Having studied the copyright industries and their lobbying tactics for over five years, I remain sceptical.

 The negotiators of the EU –US trade talks (TTIP) have learned something from ACTA. Being too specific about IPR enforcement measures brings bad publicity. This is just what the EU does not want prior to next year’s European elections.

Therefore, they have couched their requirements in a new language.  Let’s pull it apart. ‘Fostering exchange of goods and services […]’. That means they want to encourage the distribution of US movies and music in the EU, and conversely, the distribution of European music and movies in the US. Bear in mind that whilst the EU has a very small film industry, Britain, at least, has a global music industry and  a growth market in film production working for the Hollywood studios.

From their viewpoint, the showstopper is the  free circulation of their products on ‘pirate’ websites and services. If you wanted to ‘foster exchange’,   would you demand  enforcement measures to kill off those ‘pirate’ sites? Perhaps we should put that question to the USTR and DG Trade.

 Similarly, ‘reducing costs’ might also mean reducing the costs of enforcement measures. Supporting innovation might mean measures that protect the innovation of the film and music industries – which could well mean, stronger enforcementmeasures taken  against the ‘pirate’ websites.  

We learn a bit about the substance of the IPR negotiations from a  report report released by a so-called  High Level Working Group.  This  was a committee of bureacrats who will be running the talks.

 The  TTIP High Level Working Group report  says the EU-US talks will promote a high level of intellectual property protection including enforcement, and to cooperating extensively. ”

 The High Level Working Group report goes on to say that “both sides explore opportunities to address a limited number of significant IPR issues of interest to either side”. What are these limited but significant issues’?

  In the digital environment,  , ‘protection’ and  ‘enforcement’ means measures such as website blocking, payment blocking and  some form of 3 strikes  or 6 strikes. Could they also comprise the ‘limited number of significant IPR issues of interest to either side’.

 The meaning of ‘cooperating extensively’  is not clear. Are the EU and the US  cooperating with each other to produce like-for-like IPR laws?  Does it mean industry cooperation ( reprising the language of the Telecoms Package,  see "Co-operation" amendment WAS designed to support 3-strikes )? Or some other type of cooperation?

 The copyright industries' perspective does not change. Their limited interest will be to dispose of the largest peer-to-peer file-sharing sites, and to find ways of dealing with people who download or stream copyrighted material without permission or payment.

This is an original article from Iptegrity.com and reflects research that I have carried out. If you refer to it or to its content, please cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics – please cite as Monica Horten, 2013,EU-US trade talks  - Soft words but what’s the real IPR agenda? , in iptegrity.com, 24 June 2013. Commercial users - please contact me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Copyright Enforcement Enigma tells the story of the 2009 Telecoms Package and how the copyright industries tried to hijack it.

'accurate and absorbing account of the story of the Telecoms Package' -Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology

'...a must read for those interested in knowing in depth about copyright enforcement and Internet.' -Journal of Intellectual Property Rights.  

Read more  

Ask your library to get it!

Order direct from the publisher.

Go to   Amazon

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

European Parliament launch for Copyright Enforcement Enigma

Don't miss Iptegrity! Iptegrity.com  RSS/ Bookmark      

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, European expert on Internet policy and Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She is an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on Cross-border flow of Internet traffic and Internet freedom (MSI-INT). She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012. Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy. Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review

Paperback and Kindle and Epub formats.

Available from all good online bookstores or get it from the publisher Zed Books  direct:

Amazon UK

Amazon USA