Looking for help with the Online Safety Act - Ofcom consultations? Please get in touch. 

Unhappy with the UK government's proposals for "persistent letter sending", the UK music industry re-records it calls for graduated response. The comments give meaning to the "cooperation" amendment in the EU Telecoms Package.

 

Graduated response won't go away easily. The British music industry made it clear that it isn't happy with  the UK government's decision not to  cut people off the Internet as a sanction against copyright infringement. It wants to see more action from the UK government on copyright enforcement and its repeated its call for graduated response at a UK Parliament seminar this week.

Speaking at the Westminster eForum on Taming the Wild Web, Richard Mollet, director of public affairs for the BPI (the UK's  IFPI member) said:

 

"Legislation requiring ISPs to act is a welcome step, but we need   a bold stride. What we need is ISPs to take more responsibility, to work with industry on a system of graduated response, so that the infringer not only gets a letter, but gets a warning, and yes, he or she might even have their account suspended."

He continued: "Graduated response is

a fair and proportionate way of dealing with copyright infringement ane ensuring that it doesn't continue"

 

Further, in response to a comment from the chair (Roger Darlington, from the Ofcom consumer panel)  that "things are going well", Mollet said " I apologise unreservedly if I gave the impression that things are going well. The situation is unsustainable, especially in respect of copyright".

He also stressed that "self-regulation isn't going to work in terms of copyright infringement, which is why we have to legislate to make ISPs do something". Purely voluntary measures won't work, he said. 

 

Mollet's comments are interesting in respect of the bigger picture and the international drive by content industries for online copyright enforcement. For example, the EU Telecoms Package, where the British music industry has supported the French lobby in trying to get in amendments related to copyright. Although some changes have been removed by the Council,  Amendment 112 to the Universal Services directive, [Article 33(2a)] which calls for "cooperation" between the ISPs and the content industries for copyright protection, remains in there. 

dr.monica.horten.at.eclipse.foundation.london.24.nov.2016.crop.jpg

Iptegrity moves on!

May 2024: Iptegrity is being re-developed to upgrade the Joomla software.

Please bear with us until the new site is ready.

Find me on LinkedIn

About Iptegrity

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten. I am an  independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. In April 2024, I was appointed as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. I am a published author, and post-doctoral scholar. I hold a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. I cover the UK and EU. I'm a former tech journalist, and an experienced panelist and Chair. My media credits include the BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for non-commercial use. Please link back and attribute Dr Monica Horten.  Contact me to use any of my content for commercial purposes.  

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review