Looking for help with the Online Safety Act - Ofcom consultations? Please get in touch. 

Lord Mandelson, who is putting through the protectionist Digital Economy Bill on behalf of the wealthy creative industry corporations, has come out with a revised version of the BPI's website blocking clause. But beware, because this is merely a ruse to get 3-strikes carried when it goes before the House of Commons next week.

The Clause is not substantially different from the one proposed by Lord Clement-Jones and Lord Howard of Rising. All it seems to do is to create another layer of legislation, and possibly it could have two effects: one is that Mandelson is trying to get the rest of the Digital Economy bill passed before the election, so this is a ruse to leave out the most controversial clause. And, in putting it off until the political heat is also off, he can sneak it through more easily.

This clause will enable courts to order the blocking of websites. It is based on an original amendment written by the BPI (British Recorded Music Industry). It is intended to give the government a catch-all to deal with the next developement after P2P and YouTube - any new application which may be used to circulate music and film.

Lord Mandelson has written a letter of explanation to the two opposition parties, which sounds very reasonable, but given that he is spin-meister general for the government, should we believe him?

According to Linx , my interpretation would be correct. The Clause needs EU approval because it is altering our law in respect of technical standardsm. The EU requires 3 mnths notice. If Mandelson left Clause 18 in the Digital Economy Bill, opponents of the Bill would have an easy way to knock out the entire Bill. Therefore, he has left it out. He will bring it back in 3 months time, if he is still in office, having given the required notice to the EU.

All he has done is avoid an obvious legal challenge for non-compliance with an EU regulation, which would have brought the whole Bill down.

We know that the BPI are already counting on a lazy and corrupt Parliament rubber-stamping the Bill.

Here is the revised Clause 18 of the Digital Economy Bill .

Here is Lord Mandelson's letter to opposition spokesman Jeremy Hunt (who incidentally, will be facing the BPI's own Richard Mollett as the opposing Labour candidate in his South-wet Surrey constituency - see my previous article).

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) Beware as Mandelson sneaks in new web blocking clause http://www.iptegrity.com 31 March 2010


Iptegrity moves on!

May 2024: Iptegrity is being re-developed to upgrade the Joomla software.

Please bear with us until the new site is ready.

Find me on LinkedIn

About Iptegrity

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten. I am an  independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. In April 2024, I was appointed as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. I am a published author, and post-doctoral scholar. I hold a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. I cover the UK and EU. I'm a former tech journalist, and an experienced panelist and Chair. My media credits include the BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for non-commercial use. Please link back and attribute Dr Monica Horten.  Contact me to use any of my content for commercial purposes.  

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review