Looking for help with the Online Safety Act  - Ofcom consultation & guidelines? Please get in touch. 

Two of the six largest Internet Service Providers in the UK are mounting a legal challenge the 3-strikes law known as the Digital Economy Act (DE Act for short).  


TalkTalk, which has been consistent in its opposition to the DE Act, and BT, which has previously not taken action, have combined forces to  file papers in the High court. They are asking for a judicial review of the DE Act, which they claim failed to follow the correct legal procedures in respect of EU law. They do not specify the names of the directives, but they would appear to be referring to

the E-privacy directive, and E-commerce directive, and I think,  the Telecoms Package final outcome in the Framework directive.


Their concern is that ISPs will have to spend millions of pounds on new infrastructure for a law which is ultimately unworkable and which will infringe the civil liberties of UK citizens.


Charles Dunstone, Chairman, TalkTalk Group, said that the rushed process  to get the DE Act through Parliament before 6 April had resulted in flawed legislation. He pointed out that the DE Ace is to of the list of laws which the British public wanted repealed by the new coalition government.


Mr Dunstone  said in their joint written statement that  "The Digital Economy Act's measures will cost the UK hundreds of millions and many people believe they are unfair, unwarranted and won't work.  So it's no surprise that in Nick Clegg's call for laws to repeal, this Act is top of the public's ‘wish list'.  Innocent broadband customers will suffer and citizens will have their privacy invaded. We think the previous Government's rushed approach resulted in flawed legislation. That's why we need a judicial review by the High Court as quickly as possible before lots of money is spent on implementation."


The response of the British recorded music industry (BPI) as reported in the Financial Times , was to accuse the ISPs of trying to protect their profits.

There is not much more information available about the legal challenge. Out-law , which is run by the law firm Pinsent Masons, cautions that once a law has been passed by Parliament, there is little that a court can do - and the court does not have the power to overturn it.

However, Pinsent Masons say that a court may rule that a law in breach of certain obligations and force a Parliamentary review.


 It is to be presumed that this is what TalkTalk and BT are aiming for.


The outcome of the judicial review will have ramifications for other EU member states where legislative or so-called "voluntary" 3-strikes/graduated response measures are proposed. 


Further coverage: 

Daily Telegraph 

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009) UK ISPs  demand judicial review of 3-strikes law  , http://www.iptegrity.com 8 July  2010 .  



Find me on LinkedIn

About Iptegrity

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten. I am an  independent policy advisor, with expertise in online safety, technology and human rights. I am a published author, and post-doctoral scholar. I hold a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. I cover the UK and EU. I'm a former tech journalist, and an experienced panelist and Chair. My media credits include the BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for non-commercial use. Please link back and attribute Dr Monica Horten.  Contact me to use any of my content for commercial purposes.  

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review