Looking for help with the Online Safety Act - Ofcom consultations? Please get in touch. 

The Hargreaves review of  intellectual property  law gave hope to those from the digital world that the UKgovernment was prepared to consider some new thinking over the tricky aspects of digital copyright.  But the review team have been subjected to heavy rights-holder lobbying. 


The deadline for submissions to the UK's Copyright Review ended last week on Friday. The aim of the inquiry was to investigate how intellectual property (IP)  law should be changed to support new and innovative, hi-tech businesses.  Now, as they plough through the submissions, many people will be hoping that Ian Hargreaves and his team  at the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) are brave enough to come up with some truly innovative answers to the copyright dilemna.


The rights-holders have evidently not left it to chance. The IPO has put online a list of

submissions received prior to the deadline , and it is jam-packed with rights-holders, indeed technology companies and non-rights-holders are very scarce. I can spot just four technology companies  - Apple, Ericsson, Microsoft (which is also a rights-holder) and TalkTalk, the ISP which is taking the government to court over the Digital Economy Act. There do not appear to be any citizens' representatives on the list (although maybe they did appear by the final deadline?).


 Moreover, we learn that  the Creative Coalition  ( a rights-holder lobbying group)  have been in for a meeting .  The trade unions, who took part in that same meeting,  have warned Mr Hargreaves not to put jobs at risk.


Having studied this topic for the last four years, I think it is a fair guess that the rights-holders have put a heavy case for enforcement. These guys play hardball.  Moreover, many of the names on the list will almost certainly be  repetition -  it is very likely that  the members of the so-called coalition will be  the same names repeated over and over again.


All this leaves us to surmise how much real room the  Hargreaves review has to manoevre. Maybe it depends on who is really calling the shots in this review. David  Cameron's new friends at Google, or his old ones (cuddling up to Jeremy Hunt) in the music and entertainment  industries?


This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2011) Rights-holders heavy UK copyright inquiry   http://www.iptegrity.com 10 February 2011



Iptegrity moves on!

May 2024: Iptegrity is being re-developed to upgrade the Joomla software.

Please bear with us until the new site is ready.

Find me on LinkedIn

About Iptegrity

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten. I am an  independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. In April 2024, I was appointed as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. I am a published author, and post-doctoral scholar. I hold a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. I cover the UK and EU. I'm a former tech journalist, and an experienced panelist and Chair. My media credits include the BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for non-commercial use. Please link back and attribute Dr Monica Horten.  Contact me to use any of my content for commercial purposes.  

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review