Can a court quash the Digital Economy Act ? This is the British law which brings in a version of 3-strikes and it comes to court this week in a unique case.

***The arguments set out in this article are based on the case set out in legal documentation from  BT and TalkTalk. I intend to go to the court tomorrow and will be posting further on this case.***

Tomorrow the British high court will hear the case against the government put by two ISPs, British Telecom and TalkTalk (Carphone Warehouse). There are asking the court to quash the DE Act.  It is possibly the first instance of its kind where a court has been asked to review a law which has been passed by Parliament.

 The Digital Economy Act includes provisions for copyright enforcement measures in respect of peer-to-peer file-sharing and Internet content, which mean that people may be warned, put on blacklists and ultimately have their connection suspended as a punishment.

If the two ISPs  win, the Digital Economy  Act becomes unenforceable and lapses.  BT and Talk Talk will argue that the government

The basis of their case states that the DE Act places specific obligations on the ISPs and as such it regulates the business of Internet Service provision. They assert that it prescribes measures to a level of detail  which cannot be reversed and that it is not, as the government will argue, merely a shell to be filled in later.

Any law which creates new obligations for ISPs must be notified to the European Commission.

BT and Talk Talk are asking for declaratory relief  - that is, they are asking the court to state that the law is, for the  reasons given, unenforceable and  they want   a quashing order, which would stop the government from implementing the DE Act.

Of course, it was the previous Labour government which was responsible for rushing the DE Act into Parliament, and the new coalition government which is now being sued.

Additional claims by BT and Talk Talk assert that the Digital Economy Act contravenes two European laws, namely the E-privacy directive and the E-commerce directive. In particular, they cite the provisions in these laws which regulate interference with private communications, and storage of communications data. They argue that the DE Act breaches the mere conduit provision, which says that ISPs are not liable for content on their networks.

A final claim asserts that the Act is in breach of certain fundamental rights, and relies in a small part on Article 1.3a of the European Framework directive, which was the final agreement of the Telecoms Package.

I am interested to see how the barristers present these arguments in court tomorrow.

A number of  rights-holders have asked to make interventions, as have the trade unions who support them. They are supposed to address the claim as stated by BT and Talk Talk.

The hearing promises to be fun - and I say this with the British sense of irony!

• < Prev
• Next >