Platform responsibility? Get the backstory - check my book The Closing of the Net - only £15.99!

5th post in a series on the government's response to  Hargreaves

Did the DE Act intend private companies running (Indian?)  call centres to be the Appeals Body?

Under proposals  published in August, Ofcom plans to privatise the  Appeals  process for the Digital Economy Act copyright enforcement measures.   Ofcom plans to run a commercial tender for a private company  to run the new Appeals body, which will sit in judgement on allegations of downloading copyrighted material and ultimately on whether people are cut off. Effectively, the Appeals Body, which will perform a quasi-judicial function, will be outsourced,

and it is not clear what kind of oversight there will be or how its duties will be defined.

What is clear is that cost will be a significant factor in Ofcom’s final selection  – up to 30  per cent of the decision will be down to cost. This means that the successful bidder will be under pressure to keep costs down.

 The funding for the Appeals Body will come from the  rights-holder groups, notably the BPI and the Motion Picture Association.   It is not  transparent whether or not they will have any say in either the tendering process or the budget.

 The way the costings have been prepared is suggestive of a call centre operation. This is especially concerning.

Just imagine the successful private bidder, under cost pressure, sets up the call centre in India. Will we be facing the scenario of an Indian call centre meting out   British justice?

 The role of the Appeals body is to review allegations of copyright infringement  made against British citizens, who stand to be taken to court if their appeal fails – and in future, the appeal could directly concern a punishment.

Under the Digital Economy Act, people who are accused of copyright infringement, and who are sent warning notices by the ISP, may appeal against the notices. They may also place an appeal against going on the so-called Repeat Infringers List. The reason why the appeal could be important to them, is that the notification and the List, are the preparatory stages of a judicial process. Under the Act as it currently stands, rights-holders will be expected to take court action against the people on the Repeat Infringers List. 

If the Technical Measures are ever brought in, then the Repeat Infringers list would form the basis of a suite of automated punishments - including cutting off Internet access.

The Appeals Body must legally be independent of Ofcom, but under such a privatised system, there will be obvious questions of oversight. It risks, among other things, creating a massive bureaucratic hierarchy which was not intended under the DE Act.

It is of course totally outrageous for Ofcom to even propose a privatised system for the appeals process and is yet another pointer to Ofcom’s failure to take on board the citizenship aspects of copyright enforcement.

Please attribute this article: Monica Horten (2011) Ofcom invites private bids to run Appeals Process  23 September 2011 .




States v the 'Net? 

Read The Closing of the Net, by me, Monica Horten.

"original and valuable"  Times higher Education

" essential read for anyone interested in understanding the forces at play behind the web."

Find out more about the book here  The Closing of the Net


FROM £15.99

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

In 2012, I presented my PhD research in the European Parliament.

Don't miss Iptegrity!  RSS/ Bookmark is the website of Dr Monica Horten. She is a policy analyst specialising in Internet governance & European policy, including platform accountability. She is a published author & Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She served as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on  Internet Freedom. She has worked on CoE, EU and UNDP funded projects in eastern Europe and the Caucasus. In a voluntary capacity, she has led UK citizen delegations to the European Parliament. She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012.

Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy (and related issues on Brexit). Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review