A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms   Due August 2013.

Internet Threats

Copyright enforcement is not the only threat to the open and neutral Internet. Since I began researching EU policy in 2007, we have seen several different groups of stakeholders lobbying for blocks to be placed on websites or user access. One of those groups of stakeholders is concerned with children, and confuses the method of dealing with child pornography, which is a  criminal offence, with parental control of what children see. These are two quite different problems, and  the policy approach should be addressed in different fora. Other calls for Internet blocking are now arising in respect to libel and defamation, and we have seen this in the UK with the Twitter injunctions. Further calls came after the recent UK riots - a knee-jerk to block Blackberry Messenger, without any real consideration of how such blocking would solve the actual problem at hand. This section will address these issues in relation to policy and the EU.

ISPs and hosting sites could be subject to increased liability for defamatory content, uner  new laws proposed in two EU Member States: Italy and Britain. However, the recent case of Lord McAlpine  in Britain illustrates how the existing law can cope very well with defamation via the Internet, and seems to suggest an interesting solution – if only policy-makers would consider it!

Read more: Defamation on the Net: can an aging Lord show the way?

 How could an EU-Canada Trade Agreement change copyright law?

 An alert has been issued over the possible inclusion of copyright enforcment measures – and in particular, of criminal sanctions -  in a new  EU- Canada Trade Agreement (CETA). It is understood that the proposed criminal measures could be similar to those in the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).

Read more: EU–Canada Trade Agreement – copyright enforcement via the cat-flap?

Lord Mandelson has written to the Financial Times about the photos of Prince Harry’s  antics in a Las Vegas hotel room.  His point is not however, about the ethics of  playing strip-billiards. No, he was commenting on the effect of the Internet on privacy and freedom of expression,  and on the profitability of  news media. His comments apply equally to todays publication of photos of Kate Middleton.

It was Lord Mandelson, you will recall, who forced in the Digital Economy Act  with technical measures  to block access to copyright-infringing  material.   In Lord Mandelson’s opinion, the Internet is unleashing a flood of ‘uncorroborated, undigested and unmediated news’. If you ignore the tone of the letter, which is a bit like a rant by a no-longer-important ex-Minister,  it does raise  some questions for policy-makers concerning the Internet.

Read more: Lord Mandelson, Prince Harry and closing the Internet floodgates

About Iptegrity.com

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten,  independent policy writer and Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012. Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy. Iptegrity is read by lawyers, academics, policy-makers and citizens, and cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity

Don't miss Iptegrity.com

Iptegrity.com Keep up to date - RSS feed  & Live Bookmark! 

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes

The Copyright Enforcement Enigma

Available via Amazon & online bookstores worldwide: