The Closing of the Net  "original and valuable"  Times Higher Education

It’s looking less and less likely that the new EU data privacy rules will be adopted before the 2014 Euro-elections,  as the Council of Ministers  has effectively blocked the process. Trilogues – tripartite talks between the three major EU institutions – had been proposed to start  in January, with the aim of getting an agreement in place by March. But now Iptegrity has obtained  confirmation that those plans have been stalled  and it is unclear if and when they will be re-started.

Trilogues will therefore  not take place in January. The timing is now so tight  that even if the Council gets its skates on, an agreement before June 2014 is unlikely.

 That will be a huge disappointment to the two European Parliament rapporteurs -  Jan-Philipp Albrecht, and Dimitrios Droutsas -  on the package of rules incorporating the Data Protection Regulation and a Directive on law enoforcement and data protection*. Indeed, Mr Albrecht is reported to be very angry, according to  the German news magazine Der Spiegel.  It will also disappoint the EU Justice Commissioner, Viviane Reding. They had put in a place a plan to begin trilogues next month ( Cloak of secrecy hangs over EU privacy reform )and not so long ago, Mr Albrecht had said he was confident of it happening. ( Closed-door trilogues are on the data privacy agenda

 The likelihood that the Council would prevaricate was predicted earlier this year by Iptegrity (see EU data privacy reform – does the Council have the political will? ). Certain Member States, such as Britain,  were always unlikely to approve the strong data protection rules that Mr Albrecht and Mr Droutsas wanted. However, if a powerful state such as Germany had stood firmly in favour, there was a chance that other member states could have been swayed.

 But the Council has  ways of dealing with laws that it doesn’t like. If Germany really has changed its mind, then the Council will, at best, take a long time to decide.

 Insiders suggest that one of the reasons is a change of heart by the German government, which   has joined with Britain to stall the process -  and it appears to have done this despite the hacking into Mrs Merkel’s phone by US intelligence services  .

 The signs have been there for a while. The Council  has not yet published a Common Position (its formal opinion on the regulatory package). For trilogues to have begun in January, the Common Position would have had to have been ready for discussion at the Council meeting on 6 December. It wasn’t.

 The only documents circulated by the Council concern the provisions that have excited less public controversy, including the so-called one-stop-shop regulation proposal. The Council has taken the opinion that the one-stop shop would be more beneficial to industry, and possibily negative for citizens. For that reason, it is engaging in an extensive discussion on the topic. It may be a genuine concern, but there is also a view that the Council is filibustering.

 According to the report in Der Spiegel, the problem concerns public sector opposition to the new rules. This possibility was also  suggested to Iptegrity by a Commission  insider, and may have some credence.

 The rapporteurs  have the option to put their reports to a plenary vote in the European Parliament. That would establish a formal position for the Parliament, on which it could bargain with the Council.  It would at least mean that their work would remain on the legislative table for the new Parliament to continue in September.

 *Regulation on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulatiom) [Albrecht report] and Directive on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and the free movement of such data [Droutsas report]. 

Additional info: analysis of the options on the one-stop-shop proposal by Prof. Niko Härting

 This is an original article from Iptegrity.com and reflects research that I have carried out. If you refer to it or to its content, please cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics – please cite as Monica Horten, 2013, Data privacy trilogues stalled by filibustering EU Council in Iptegrity.com,  19 December 2013.  Commercial users - please contact me.


 

 

 

 

 

 

The Copyright Enforcement Enigma tells the story of the 2009 Telecoms Package and how the copyright industries tried to hijack it.

'accurate and absorbing account of the story of the Telecoms Package' -Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology

'...a must read for those interested in knowing in depth about copyright enforcement and Internet.' -Journal of Intellectual Property Rights.  

Read more  

Ask your library to get it!

Order direct from the publisher.

Go to   Amazon

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

European Parliament launch for Copyright Enforcement Enigma

Don't miss Iptegrity! Iptegrity.com  RSS/ Bookmark      

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, European expert on Internet policy and Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She is an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on Cross-border flow of Internet traffic and Internet freedom (MSI-INT). She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012. Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy. Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes