Platform responsibility? Get the backstory - check my book The Closing of the Net - only £15.99!

The European Commission has asked the French government to clarify a number of points in respect of its Creation and Internet law, which will impose graduated response / 3 strikes measures onto Internet users.

The Commission’s requests have been made public in what appears to be a leaked document, published by the French news website La Tribune. In particular, it has asked for clarification on internal market and fundamental rights issues. It wants the information before the law is adopted,  and therefore appears to be asking France for a  temporary halt on the process until these matters are clarified:

"Les autorités françaises sont invitées à prendre en considération les remarques qui précédent ainsi qu'à fournir les clarifications demandées avant de procéder à l'adoption de leur projet notifié"

Interestingly, the Commission also confirms that the ‘fight against piracy’ and ‘co-operation’ between telecoms operators and rights holders for this purpose, is being discussed currently in the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers – in the context of the Telecoms Package review. This is an admission from the Commission which its PR material seeks to gloss over. And the Commission calls for a balanced approach in the handling of filtering measures in the Universal Services directive.

Specific matters on which

the French government is asked to clarify include:

- Internal market issues: how it will deal with infringements of French copyright that occur outside France, and infringements of foreign copyright by French users?

- Whether the sending of warning messages implies any actual knowledge on the part of an ISP? (The answer to this will be important for the ISPs).

- On what basis is it determined that a case will be pursued? What criteria are used?

- How is it justified to have an administrative authority and not a court? It points out the that: - The measures must satisfy the legal test of proportionality

- The means of securing an Internet access must not result in a general obligation for surveillance on the part of the ISP.

- The Internet is used for many services other than creative content - The law should detail measures for the development of new business models

- The law appears to jeopardise the right to due process and does not specify how errors will be avoided.

- Disabled people have special rights which could preclude cutting off their access


In specific reference to the Telecoms Package, Universal Services directive, the Commission  says that users must be informed of their legal obligations in respect of copyright, however, it continues, all measures which are more than just education, such as the filtering of users communications or the suspension of Internet access, must find a just balance between the need to combat piracy online and other important objectives such as universal access, the rights and freedoms of users, and limitation of the liability of the ISP. In particular, measures which result in the interception of the flow of Internet traffic must be treated with caution, in order to avoid negative consequences on the rights to privacy and freedom of information for Internet users in Europe.

La Tribune does not state the source of the leaked document.  

The La Tribune article is here.


If you liked this article, please remember to say you read it on!


States v the 'Net? 

Read The Closing of the Net, by me, Monica Horten.

"original and valuable"  Times higher Education

" essential read for anyone interested in understanding the forces at play behind the web."

Find out more about the book here  The Closing of the Net


FROM £15.99

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

In 2012, I presented my PhD research in the European Parliament.

Don't miss Iptegrity!  RSS/ Bookmark is the website of Dr Monica Horten. She is a policy analyst specialising in Internet governance & European policy, including platform accountability. She is a published author & Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She served as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on  Internet Freedom. She has worked on CoE, EU and UNDP funded projects in eastern Europe and the Caucasus. In a voluntary capacity, she has led UK citizen delegations to the European Parliament. She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012.

Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy (and related issues on Brexit). Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review