The French ISP ‘Free' is being accused by the rights-holders of an ‘unacceptable failure to co-operate' as it backs out of sending the first 3-strikes warning emails issued by the Hadopi..
‘The French law implementing 3-strikes/graduated response measures - also known as the Hadopi law - is being challenged before it has even got off the ground as the ISP ‘Free' backs out of an agreement and refuses to forward the warning emails to subscribers.
Free decided on Monday this week that it would not transmit the warning emails, which are the first stage of the 3-strikes process under French law. This appears to be a reversal of an agreement which it is understood was made with the French CultureMinistry, according to a report in the French technology website, Numerama . Under this agreement, it is believed that all the French ISPs, including Free, had agreed to co-operate with the 3-strikes process.
The Minister, Frédéric Mitterand, has been angered by Free's reversal. Mitterand has condemned Free's decision and has threatened to issue a decree which will enable a fine to be imposed, as reported by both Numerama and PC Inpact .
The issue appears to be that the law has put in place a fine for ISPs who do not provide user contact details to the Hadopi, but has no fine for ISPs who fail to transmit the emails. Hence the need for a decree to impose the fine on Free. The Hadopi - the public authority which oversees the law - could install its own mail servers and send the emails itself, but has so far failed to do so, relying instead on the ISPs to do use their servers.
‘Free's unco-operative attitude has given the rights-holders cause to pressure harder on the government. The French recorded music industry (SNEP) has called Free's refusal ‘deplorable, and accused Free of recruiting users who commit acts of piracy.
The SNEP also accuses Free of creating distortions of competition to the detriment of other ISPs who respect the law.
This is interesting because, if anything, Free is surely breaking away from a State-sponsored cartel. The SNEP accusation belies any attempt by the regulatory authorities to promote a competitive environment where users can switch if they are not happy.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) French ISP Free risks fine over refusal to send 3-strikes emails http://www.iptegrity.com 7 October 2010