Looking for help with the Online Safety Act  - Ofcom consultation & guidelines? Please get in touch. 

An update to French telecoms law mandates non-neutral, pro-copyright regulation of ISPs. And it's based on the Telecoms Package.

Over the summer, the French government has published its transposition of the Telecoms Package. The Sarkozy regime has used a controversial manipulation of the legislative process to get the transposition into law without going through the French Parliament. It includes provisions which

contradict the French government's stated objective of protecting net neutrality. Moreover, it includes a copyright obligation on ISPs to support France's 3-strikes law.

The French government decided earlier this year that the Telecoms Package was to be transposed by an 'ordonnance', which is secondary legislation and does not need to go before the Parliament. The ordonnance updates the existing French communications law with the requirements of the Telecoms Package.

A report from an advisory council on the digital economy which was opposed to some of the provisions in the ordonnance, was also ignored as the government sought to push through the transposition.

The French transposition of the Universal Services directive Article 20 and 21 - user contracts - makes the ISPs include a clause in their contract telling users of the legal consequnces of copyright infringement:

les consquences juridiques de l'utilisation des services de communications lectroniques pour se livrer des activits illicites ou diffuser des contenus prjudiciables, en particulier lorsqu'ils peuvent porter atteinte au respect des droits et des liberts d'autrui, y compris les atteintes aux droits d'auteur et aux droits voisins

This clause would have been included to buttress France's Hadopi (3-strikes) law in respect of the ISP liability to support copyright enforcement measures. Interestingly, as pointed out by the French technology website Numerama, the word prjudiciables has no meaning in this context.

The French government's transposition of Articles 20 and 21 also includes a translation of the provision on 'conditions limiting access to and or use of services and applications' - only the French are clearer and just say 'restrictions':

Les restrictions l'accs des services et leur utilisation, ainsi qu' celle des quipements terminaux fournis.

This means that ISPs have to inform users in the contract and in other material, of the restrictions they place on the service. Those restrictions would include blocking Skype, for example.

Again, Numerama highlights the French government's objective to guarantee net neutrality, as stated by the French industry Minister, Eric Besson, at the beginning of the ordonnance itself. Far from being a guarantee of net neutrality, the ordonnance includes a built-in dis-respect for it. Indeed, the French ordonnance makes clear that terminal equipment, as well as services, may be subject to restrictions.

The full story on the Contracts clause in the Telecoms Package is discussed in my book The Copyright Enforcement Enigma: Internet Politics and the 'Telecoms Package'

PLEASE CITE AS: Monica Horten (2011) France puts copyright in ISP contract http://www.iptegrity.com 1 September 2011 . This article is licensed under a Creative Commons License for non-commercial purposes, with the author attributed.

internet.freedom.strasbourg.sept2016.jpg

Find me on LinkedIn

About Iptegrity

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten. I am an  independent policy advisor, with expertise in online safety, technology and human rights. I am a published author, and post-doctoral scholar. I hold a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. I cover the UK and EU. I'm a former tech journalist, and an experienced panelist and Chair. My media credits include the BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for non-commercial use. Please link back and attribute Dr Monica Horten.  Contact me to use any of my content for commercial purposes.  

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review