The Closing of the Net  "original and valuable"  Times Higher Education

The Hollande government in France seems unable to decide on a policy  position for copyright.  Not long ago,  it shunted the Hadopi authority into a siding,  now  it is calling other Member States aboard for new  Europe-wide anti-piracy  measures.

 In a new position  paper, issued at the European Council of Ministers meeting in Brussels this week, the French government has called for a new European plan to address  copyright infringement and counterfeits. Using rights-holder language, it says it wants to ‘re-launch of the fight against piracy’ in Europe,  and it puts forward  possible avenues for the EU to explore.  Most concerning, is its proposal to

promote the development of agreements between the Internet companies and the rights-holders. The paper does not elaborate on this proposal. However, ‘voluntary agreements’ in this context are highly problematic.

 Voluntary agreements  are only ‘voluntary’ because they are not enshrined in legislation. However, they  are only likely to happen  with  the backing of the  government, and this is root owhy there are so problematic.

 Under European law, any such measures that are intended to restict access to the Internet, must respect fundamental rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. That means, the rights to freedom of expression and the hotly contested   - currently – right to privacy. There is also the oft-forgotten right to due process.

 These rights must be respected by the firms being asked to implement the so-called voluntary measures, and therein lies the first difficulty.

 For example, the right to due process implies a court procedure, even if only a cut-down version such as the one used in France’s Hadopi  law. Commercial firms implementing punishment measures against individuals  would be in breach of this right. The outcome may well be that the measures will be limited to the sending of notices only, but even then, the measures need to be carefully designed to avoid falling foul of this right.

 In other words, it is not appropriate for commercial businesses to be asked to take action against individuals, on behalf of another business, without the State ensuring that due process is followed.

 Voluntary agreements in this context, are entered into by businesses from two different industries, with conflicting financial interests. They must be formulated in a way that will not fall foul of the shareholder’s interests, which means that costs and liabilities must be carefully negotiated. That is a not insignificant difficulty that is very often overlooked. It means that the negotiations will be lengthy and complex, and the ultimate outcome may be  unsatisfactory for both sides.

 And, as the Hadopi experiment has shown, the State-managed route is riddled with problems too and has thus far not proved to have the effect that was sought. ( See Hadopi turns three – bon anniversaire? )

 A separate proposal from the French government is to regulate platforms and applications. Once again, the text is short on detail. Given the French attempt to regulate some of Google’s activities, it’s possible that is what it has in mind. The risk is that 'regulation of platforms' could become a private policing of copyright.

It does seem as though the Hollande government is becoming a little schizoid in its policy for online copyright enforcement. However, with EU’s overriding priorities now shifting towards privacy regulation and controlling espionnage against its own governments, the best hope for these French copyright  proposals is that they simply are buried.


To read more about copyright enforcement (so-called anti-piracy) measures, the Internet and fundamental rights, please see my latest book A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms

 This is an original article from and reflects research that I have carried out. If you refer to it or to its content, please cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to Media and Academics – please cite as Monica Horten, 2013, France wants to relaunch the EU fight against piracy  in,  25 October 2013.  Commercial users - please contact me.







The Copyright Enforcement Enigma tells the story of the 2009 Telecoms Package and how the copyright industries tried to hijack it.

'accurate and absorbing account of the story of the Telecoms Package' -Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology

'...a must read for those interested in knowing in depth about copyright enforcement and Internet.' -Journal of Intellectual Property Rights.  

Read more  

Ask your library to get it!

Order direct from the publisher.

Go to   Amazon

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

European Parliament launch for Copyright Enforcement Enigma

Don't miss Iptegrity!  RSS/ Bookmark is the website of Dr Monica Horten, European expert on Internet policy and Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She is an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on Cross-border flow of Internet traffic and Internet freedom (MSI-INT). She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012. Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy. Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes

The politics of copyright

A Copyright Masquerade - How corporate lobbying threatens online freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review

Paperback and Kindle and Epub formats.

Available from all good online bookstores or get it from the publisher Zed Books  direct:

Amazon UK

Amazon USA