Platform responsibility? Get the backstory - check my book The Closing of the Net - only £15.99!

European civil liberties groups are calling on MEPs to reject a Telecoms Package amendment that, if passed in its present form, could permit network operators to collect and mine users Internet and email data.


European Digital Rights (EDRi), France's La Quadrature du Net, and Germany's AK Vorrat have jointly  issued a  warning  about  Amendment 181 in the e-Privacy directive of the e-Privacy directive. They say it is so badly worded that it potentially allows operators to collect an unlimited amount of personal data related to our communications usage, including email traffic records and web surfing data. Vast 'pools' of data could be  stored for an unlimited amount of time, which goes much further than  the existing EU law in the Data Retention directive. 


The problems lie in both the European Parliament and the Council versions of the amendment.  The European Parliament version provides some protection for end-users but also could be interpreted as allowing the data to be passed to a third party.

 The Council version removes all data protection requirements whilst limiting the scope to security purposes.

 They are joined by the European

 Data Protection Supervisor, Peter Hustinx,  who warns against the risk of abuse.  The EDPS has advised that Amendment 181  should either be rejected or the data protection safeguards for users should be reinstated.

 However, caution should be the watchword on this issue. Should it be dropped or re-worded? The problem with the Telecoms Package concerns how the different amendments link together. This amendment doesn't function in isolation and the consquences for user's privacy can alter with any new revisions to the amdendment, or to other amendments. For example, the Parliament  passed amendments to Article 4 1a and 1b (Amendment  122). Amendment 122 combined with Amendment 181  provided a loop-hole for filtering peer-to-peer traffic. The Council dropped Amendment 122, however, we do not yet know the final fate of it in the trialogue discussions.

 And  it seems to me that this could be the first trigger of an e-privacy timebomb, sitting quietly, inside the Telecoms Package. Amendment 181 is not the only amendment in the Telecoms Package with implications for compromising users privacy. There have been several interest groups lobbying for the weakening of privacy law in one way or another. There are several different industry agendas.  The copyright lobby, the telco lobby, the IT security lobby. Each one wants something slightly different. All believe their business will benefit from weaker privacy rules, increased  access to personal data,  and as little as possible regulatory oversight of their activities. The practices they intend  will include traffic processing, traffic filtering, graduated response, network security and "traffic management".


It raises the issue of privacy for users on telecommunications network and the Internet, with a host of  questions which  should be aired and debated before the legislation is passed. An important issue is how much regulatory oversight is needed, and at what level should intervention occur. This should be a wake-up call for anyone who is concerned about e-privacy!



If you found this article useful, remember you read it on! 



States v the 'Net? 

Read The Closing of the Net, by me, Monica Horten.

"original and valuable"  Times higher Education

" essential read for anyone interested in understanding the forces at play behind the web."

Find out more about the book here  The Closing of the Net


FROM £15.99

Copyright Enforcement Enigma launch, March 2012

In 2012, I presented my PhD research in the European Parliament.

Don't miss Iptegrity!  RSS/ Bookmark is the website of Dr Monica Horten. She is a policy analyst specialising in Internet governance & European policy, including platform accountability. She is a published author & Visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics & Political Science. She served as an independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee on  Internet Freedom. She has worked on CoE, EU and UNDP funded projects in eastern Europe and the Caucasus. In a voluntary capacity, she has led UK citizen delegations to the European Parliament. She was shortlisted for The Guardian Open Internet Poll 2012.

Iptegrity  offers expert insights into Internet policy (and related issues on Brexit). Iptegrity has a core readership in the Brussels policy community, and has been cited in the media. Please acknowledge Iptegrity when you cite or link.  For more, see IP politics with integrity is made available free of charge for  non-commercial use, Please link-back & attribute Monica Horten. Thank you for respecting this.

Contact  me to use  iptegrity content for commercial purposes