MEP Malcolm Harbour has attacked the OpenNet coalition of user NGOs and ISPs on the European Parliament website. The rapporteur for the Universal Services and Users Rights directive, accuses a group of knowledgable users of 'pure fantasy.' His article appears to be part of a series of moves to close down all opposition to the Telecoms Package plenary vote today in the European Parliament.
The OpenNet coalition, which runs the Blackout Europe site has been angered by an attack from Malcolm Harbour which accuses them of ‘pure fantasy' in respect of their interpretation of the Telecoms Package amendments. He names the Blackout Europe website on a ‘major news ‘ page posted on the European Parliament's website, where he says he is "astonished" to see their text and claims that "the Telecoms Package has never been anything to do with restrictions on the Internet".
The Opennet coalition has responded with a robust rebuttal of Mr Harbour's ‘fantasy' allegation and suggest that, on the contrary, his claims are misinforming the European public. It exposes the real issues behind his claims by citing several examples where he himself has been quoted discussing restrictions to Internet services (see link below). The coaltion consists of NGOs from almost all member states, including Italy'sScambio Etico, France's La Quadrature du Net, Germany's AK Vorrat, the UK's Open Rights Group, EDRi, EBLIDA, and 200 Internet Service Providers. It suggests that Mr Harbour is out of order to assume that they are mis-informed about the Telecoms Package or its implications.
If the EU is serious about talking to users, and run a consultation with them, as is suggested by Mrs Trautmann, then insulting them in such a manner would not seem to be the best way to go about it. And one could question whether this is an appropriate use of the European Parliament's own website, especially so close to an election.
The BlackoutEurope Facebook group now has close to 20,000 members - it has grown to this size since the beginning of April. If anything can indicate strength of feeling among users, then this must demonstrate it. It is one of a number of different groups which are now springing up to campaign against the Telecoms Package, but it is also by far, the largest.
Tthe OpenNet coalition rebuttal of Malcolm Harbour's allegations can be viewed on the BlackoutEurope website.
Mr Harbour's article can be viewed on the European Parliament website. It is interesting to see the comments that people have left - it does not look like the agree with him.
It seems to me strangely Orwellian to think that you can tell people something and they will believe it as the truth. Especially when they are capable of reading the law for themselves. The documentary evidence is there to demonstrate that this is giving disinformation to European citizens to defend decisions taken behind closed doors. in the back-rooms of Brussels.
Today is the Telecoms Package second reading plenary vote . It can be viewed on a webacast here.As I have watched developments over the past few days, it seems to me that the European Parliament is trying to close down this vote, forcing MEPs to vote for a bad law on the orders of the Council of Ministers, and the UK and French governments. All opposition is being silenced and MEPs are frightened even of voting in favour of the amendments which they previously voted for, namely Amendments 138 and 166. Mr Harbour's article is indicative of this, as is his email attack on Swedish Internet-defender MEP Christofer Fjellner, who appears to have been pressured to follow the line of his party group, the EPP. Fjellner spoke in the Telecoms Package debate in the European Parliament yesterday, but his words were confused and it seemed to me that he was flustered and harassed, like a man who has been agonising with his conscience over other pressures.
MEPs today have to make the choice whether they stand up for users rights and civil liberties, by voting for the original Amendments 138 and 166, and the Citizens Rights Amendments , or whether they vote for Internet blocking, and toe the Harbour /Trautmann line. Their choice will als indicate that whether or not the European Parliament really is a democratic institution, capable of wielding real power on behalf of European citizens, or whether it is a lapdog to the powerful governments in the Council - namely the UK, France and Germany.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009) Users angered by Harbour's 'fantasy' claims, iptegrity.com,6 May 2009.