IP = Internet Protocol

IP = Intellectual Property

Integrity = a quality we would like to see in politics



Iptegrity.com is released under a Creative Commons licence.

Please attribute the author when quoting or using it as a reference source.

The correct citation is shown on each article.

Don't miss iptegrity

Use Live Bookmarks in your browser to keep up to date with iptegrity.com (RSS feed)

Login / Comment

You will need to log in to make a comment on any of the Policy Matters articles.
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
It is free to create an account. When you have created it, you will get an email, telling you how to activate it.

 Support IPTEGRITY

Iptegrity.com provides comment and news on EU Internet policy that is independent of all commercial and political interests. 


Your donation will help to keep it that way.

 

Home arrow Policy Matters arrow Telecoms package arrow Reding will not oppose Amendment 138
Reding will not oppose Amendment 138
Written by Monica Horten   
Oct 06, 2008 at 09:50 AM

In contradiction to previous unverified reports, it now appears that Viviane Reding, European Commissioner for Information Society, does support Amendment 138 of the Telecoms Package - or at least, she won't go against it.   Brussels sources close to Mrs Reding have confirmed  that Mrs Reding will not oppose the amendment given that it was the subject of a very large majority in the Parliament. 

Update 7 October 2008 This has now been confirmed by a Commission official at a press conference - see links below. 

Amendment 138 of the Telecoms Package is the citizens' amendment, proposed by the French MEP Guy Bono, and reinforces a principle voted by the European Parliament in April 2008, within the Bono report (Report on the Cultural Industries in Europe). It states that a court ruling must be obtained in respect of sanctions against Internet users who are alleged to have illegally downloaded copyrighted material. It is widely being interpreted as the death of graduated response / 3 strikes measures. 

Amendment 138 was subject to last minute horse-trading in the European Parliament, and the text as voted - with an oral amendment - was agreed on a cross-party basis, which is why it was able to obtain such a large majority - 573 in favour and only 74 against. The majority included a large number of the EPP conservative group, as well as the socialists and greens.   

Reports (see previous article on iptegrity.com) have suggested that Mrs Reding wanted it withdrawn, but they were not officially confirmed. This view could have been inferred from a statement by the French Culture Minister, Christine Albanel, which alleged  that the European Commission has never supported Amendment 138: "La ministre rappelle qu'aucun des Etats membres qui composent le Conseil, pas plus que la Commission, n'ont manifesté leur volonté de soutenir un amendement de cette nature".  It is now apparent that the Commission's position is different from that suggested by Mme Albanel.

 As I understand it, the Council position on the Telecoms Package  is also not so clear cut. There are suggestions that the French are in a minority of one, and that other member states oppose the inclusion of content measures in the Telecoms Package. 

Mrs Reding is between a rock and a hard place. She wants to be

viewed as the champion of the low cost phone call, and the benefactor of consumers. And yet, she wants to retain the support of copyright lobby, as indicated in her recent interview with Silicon.fr , where she indicates possible support for some form of Internet filtering:  'contrôler ou filtrer le contenu qui passe par les réseaux doit être fait avec la plus grande prudence' (controlling or filtering the content which passes over the networks must be done with the greatest care'). 

 

The next stage in the process  is that the Telecoms Package text which was adopted by the Parliament goes to the European Commission for an opinion, and at the same time, it goes to the Council. The Commission's opinion will be its formal response, however it is likely that there will be behind-the-scenes discussions. The Council's opinion is the one that counts the most. It can either approve the text as it is, or send it back with further amendments, in which case it goes to a second reading in the European Parliament. 

 

A European Commission spokesperson confirmed the Commisson's support for the citizens amendment 138 at a press conference late yesterday.

Reports from the press conference on Liberation.fr

 

You Tube video of the answer given at the press conference, by Commission  spokesman and member of Reding's cabinet, Martin Selmayr.

Updated 9th October.

The Commission did put a press release online, but it has mysteriously disappeared so here is a pdf which you may download.

 

Other coverage:

Euronews: the Commission stands behind the Parliament.  

 


User Comments
Please login or register to add comments

Last Updated ( Oct 09, 2008 at 01:37 PM )
<Previous   Next>

 "We who love the Internet

say that user rights are

defined by what we use our

Internet subscriptions for.

We do not want to be

reduced to consumers so

that our rights are only 

what is in the subscription

agreement. "

Eva-Britt Svensson, MEP


Your Freedom to

 repeal the DE Act

 


La Quadrature du Net

La Quadrature du Net

Don't disconnect us!  

European Commission Creative Content Online consultation

AK Zensur

AK Vorrat

Open Rights Group

open rights group

Exgae

  Code

GetUp Action for Australia

 Campaign against Internet filtering in Australia

...AK Vorrat - against data retention

  AK vorrat