IP = Internet Protocol

IP = Intellectual Property

Integrity = a quality we would like to see in politics



Iptegrity.com is released under a Creative Commons licence.

Please attribute the author when quoting or using it as a reference source.

The correct citation is shown on each article.

Don't miss iptegrity

Use Live Bookmarks in your browser to keep up to date with iptegrity.com (RSS feed)

Login / Comment

You will need to log in to make a comment on any of the Policy Matters articles.
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
It is free to create an account. When you have created it, you will get an email, telling you how to activate it.

 Support IPTEGRITY

Iptegrity.com provides comment and news on EU Internet policy that is independent of all commercial and political interests. 


Your donation will help to keep it that way.

 

Home arrow Policy Matters arrow Digital Britain arrow UK 3-strikes - MP urges consultancy not censorship
UK 3-strikes - MP urges consultancy not censorship
Written by Monica Horten   
Aug 20, 2009 at 11:42 AM

 A UK MP has spoken up in the online copyright enforcement debate, urging that  the policy-makers look into the possibilities for new business models before imposing draconian measures such as automated suspension of Internet access and throttling of peer-to-peer users. To which I have added a few  suggestions for the beleagured chaps at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

 

Tom Watson, the Labour Member of Parliament for West Bromwich East, and Civil Service Minister, has entered the 3-strikes debate. He  suggests that instead of consulting on how to punish Internet users, the government's resources would be better spent on helping

companies to set up viable alternative distribution structures for online music and entertainment. The way to begin, he says, is by asking the right questions.

 

Mr Watson argues that  ‘technical measures'  are, to all intents and purposes protectionist measures, for an industry that is resisting change. The government should be looking  at how to  promote innovation, and understand the real business drivers for online entertainment. 

 

I have a few suggestions of my own to help BIS come up with the questions:

1. A public examination of the  financial results of the music and entertainment companies that are lobbying to get Internet users cut off. Since they are asking for measures which will entail the surveillance of the entire population, they should be prepared to lay open their accounts for public inspection.  (Several of the relevant companies are subsidiaries, and  published accounts are not available)

 2. Obtain and publish an analysis of the cash flows and revenue models of these companies, so that it will be possible to establish the correct starting point for a discussion. For example, it may be possible to find areas for cost-savings, which would improve their profitability. From a societal perspective, this may be more desirable than  asking  others to carry out sanctions on their behalf,

3. The next step is to map out possible new business models in the appropriate level of detail. If BIS are unsure where to begin, then I suggest the classic marketing quadruple of Product, Place, Price and Promotion.

4 Followed by   NPV calculations based on a range of scenarios, using agreed and public assumptions. This is tool to aid decision-making regarding which new business models may prove most effective.

5 And finally ...  the European Commission needs to grasp the Collecting Socities nettle and sort out a way to get multi-territory rights for online distribution.

 

If BIS are unclear where to start, I can highly recommend Harold Vogel,   Entertainment Industry Economics: a guide for financial analysis

It is  written in such a way that an industry outsider can easily follow it, and will enable them to ask the right questions.

Incidentally, the company asking Lord Peter Mandelson for technical measures to cut off Internet users - Steven Spielberg's Dreamworks Studio -   has just raised $825 million in funding - quite a coup in  today's hard times!


Read Tom Watson's blog post

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009)UK 3-trikes -  MP urges consultancy not censorship,  http://www.iptegrity.com 4 May 2009.  


User Comments
Please login or register to add comments

Last Updated ( Aug 20, 2009 at 05:42 PM )
<Previous   Next>

 "We who love the Internet

say that user rights are

defined by what we use our

Internet subscriptions for.

We do not want to be

reduced to consumers so

that our rights are only 

what is in the subscription

agreement. "

Eva-Britt Svensson, MEP


Your Freedom to

 repeal the DE Act

 


La Quadrature du Net

La Quadrature du Net

Don't disconnect us!  

European Commission Creative Content Online consultation

AK Zensur

AK Vorrat

Open Rights Group

open rights group

Exgae

  Code

GetUp Action for Australia

 Campaign against Internet filtering in Australia

...AK Vorrat - against data retention

  AK vorrat