IP = Internet Protocol

IP = Intellectual Property

Integrity = a quality we would like to see in politics



Iptegrity.com is released under a Creative Commons licence.

Please attribute the author when quoting or using it as a reference source.

The correct citation is shown on each article.

Don't miss iptegrity

Use Live Bookmarks in your browser to keep up to date with iptegrity.com (RSS feed)

Login / Comment

You will need to log in to make a comment on any of the Policy Matters articles.
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
It is free to create an account. When you have created it, you will get an email, telling you how to activate it.

 Support IPTEGRITY

Iptegrity.com provides comment and news on EU Internet policy that is independent of all commercial and political interests. 


Your donation will help to keep it that way.

 

Home arrow Policy Matters arrow Digital Britain arrow What is a serious failure of an Internet registry?
What is a serious failure of an Internet registry?
Written by Monica Horten   
Feb 04, 2010 at 07:33 PM

Digital Economy Bill: Nominet provisions. Should the government be able to step in and take over the Internet domain registry? If so, under what conditions?

 

The final stages of  the House of Lords examination of  the Digital Economy Bill  saw their lordships arguing over  a clause which will give the government the power to take over the Internet domain registry in cases where there has been a "serious failure" .

 

The government wants the provision (in Clause 18)  because the Internet is now so important for the UK economy.  One would asssume that the concern relates to the management of the domain servers by the registry, and ensuring that they do not become sloppy resulting in network failures for consumers downstream. However, the government has not specified that

purpose and the concern is that it could abuse the power to take over the running of the Internet.

 

Lord Lucas and the Earl of Errol were  concerned that commercial interests could put  pressure on the government to take over  a registry to support their business needs.

 

Lord de Mauley (Conservative) asked what is "serious"? The definition in the Bill only says that it must harm the reputation of the network operator, or harm the interests of consumers. He  called for the Bill to include an obligation for the government to consult on this matter, such that it cannot be used as an arbitrary measure.

 

Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative) asked whether this was nationalisation of the domain registry, because the provision specifies the right for  the government to appoint a manager to take over the registry. Domain registries are  private companies under UK law, and one concern is that once the government has its own ‘manager' to take over from the company directors, he could potentially interfere with other parts of the company operations. .

 

The government said that it would be a reserve power only, and only used in extreme situations. It  accepted amendments to ensure that the clause only affects domains which are clearly linked to the UK economy, and not to non-UK  web domains.  The main registry affected will be Nominet, which runs the .co.uk domain.

 

The question is whether the government should have the right to take over what is effectively a part of  the essential infrastructure for an industry. I wonder if there are any precedents to this. Can the government step in and take over a key institution in the banking industry, or the energy sector?

The debate on Clause 18 Internet domain registry provisions is available online. 

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) What is a serious failure of an Internet registry?  http://www.iptegrity.com 4 February 2010


User Comments
Please login or register to add comments

Last Updated ( Mar 27, 2010 at 02:20 PM )
<Previous   Next>

 "We who love the Internet

say that user rights are

defined by what we use our

Internet subscriptions for.

We do not want to be

reduced to consumers so

that our rights are only 

what is in the subscription

agreement. "

Eva-Britt Svensson, MEP


Your Freedom to

 repeal the DE Act

 


La Quadrature du Net

La Quadrature du Net

Don't disconnect us!  

European Commission Creative Content Online consultation

AK Zensur

AK Vorrat

Open Rights Group

open rights group

Exgae

  Code

GetUp Action for Australia

 Campaign against Internet filtering in Australia

...AK Vorrat - against data retention

  AK vorrat