IP = Internet Protocol

IP = Intellectual Property

Integrity = a quality we would like to see in politics



Iptegrity.com is released under a Creative Commons licence.

Please attribute the author when quoting or using it as a reference source.

The correct citation is shown on each article.

Don't miss iptegrity

Use Live Bookmarks in your browser to keep up to date with iptegrity.com (RSS feed)

Login / Comment

You will need to log in to make a comment on any of the Policy Matters articles.
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
It is free to create an account. When you have created it, you will get an email, telling you how to activate it.

 Support IPTEGRITY

Iptegrity.com provides comment and news on EU Internet policy that is independent of all commercial and political interests. 


Your donation will help to keep it that way.

 

Home arrow Digital Britain arrow UK ISPs demand judicial review of 3-strikes law
UK ISPs demand judicial review of 3-strikes law | Print |
Written by Monica Horten   
Jul 08, 2010 at 08:28 PM

Two of the six largest Internet Service Providers in the UK are mounting a legal challenge the 3-strikes law known as the Digital Economy Act (DE Act for short).  

 

TalkTalk, which has been consistent in its opposition to the DE Act, and BT, which has previously not taken action, have combined forces to  file papers in the High court. They are asking for a judicial review of the DE Act, which they claim failed to follow the correct legal procedures in respect of EU law. They do not specify the names of the directives, but they would appear to be referring to

the E-privacy directive, and E-commerce directive, and I think,  the Telecoms Package final outcome in the Framework directive.

 

Their concern is that ISPs will have to spend millions of pounds on new infrastructure for a law which is ultimately unworkable and which will infringe the civil liberties of UK citizens.

 

Charles Dunstone, Chairman, TalkTalk Group, said that the rushed process  to get the DE Act through Parliament before 6 April had resulted in flawed legislation. He pointed out that the DE Ace is to of the list of laws which the British public wanted repealed by the new coalition government.

 

Mr Dunstone  said in their joint written statement that  "The Digital Economy Act's measures will cost the UK hundreds of millions and many people believe they are unfair, unwarranted and won't work.  So it's no surprise that in Nick Clegg's call for laws to repeal, this Act is top of the public's ‘wish list'.  Innocent broadband customers will suffer and citizens will have their privacy invaded. We think the previous Government's rushed approach resulted in flawed legislation. That's why we need a judicial review by the High Court as quickly as possible before lots of money is spent on implementation."

 

The response of the British recorded music industry (BPI) as reported in the Financial Times , was to accuse the ISPs of trying to protect their profits.

There is not much more information available about the legal challenge. Out-law , which is run by the law firm Pinsent Masons, cautions that once a law has been passed by Parliament, there is little that a court can do - and the court does not have the power to overturn it.

However, Pinsent Masons say that a court may rule that a law in breach of certain obligations and force a Parliamentary review.

 

 It is to be presumed that this is what TalkTalk and BT are aiming for.

 

The outcome of the judicial review will have ramifications for other EU member states where legislative or so-called "voluntary" 3-strikes/graduated response measures are proposed. 

 

Further coverage: 

Daily Telegraph 

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009) UK ISPs  demand judicial review of 3-strikes law  , http://www.iptegrity.com 8 July  2010 .  

 


User Comments
Please login or register to add comments

Last Updated ( Jul 08, 2010 at 08:36 PM )
<Previous   Next>

 "Any competent authority

 in charge of making

restrictions on  users'

Internet access, will have

to give users the

opportunity to

take part in a prior, fair

procedure, where the

principle of presumption

of innocence and right to

privacy are fully respected. 

Alejo Vidal Quadras,  MEP


Your Freedom to

 repeal the DE Act

 


La Quadrature du Net

La Quadrature du Net

Don't disconnect us!  

European Commission Creative Content Online consultation

AK Zensur

AK Vorrat

Open Rights Group

open rights group

Exgae

  Code

GetUp Action for Australia

 Campaign against Internet filtering in Australia

...AK Vorrat - against data retention

  AK vorrat