IP = Internet Protocol

IP = Intellectual Property

Integrity = a quality we would like to see in politics



Iptegrity.com is released under a Creative Commons licence.

Please attribute the author when quoting or using it as a reference source.

The correct citation is shown on each article.

Don't miss iptegrity

Use Live Bookmarks in your browser to keep up to date with iptegrity.com (RSS feed)

Login / Comment

You will need to log in to make a comment on any of the Policy Matters articles.
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
It is free to create an account. When you have created it, you will get an email, telling you how to activate it.

 Support IPTEGRITY

Iptegrity.com provides comment and news on EU Internet policy that is independent of all commercial and political interests. 


Your donation will help to keep it that way.

 

Home arrow ACTA arrow ACTA will stall till Autumn, says European Commissioner
ACTA will stall till Autumn, says European Commissioner | Print |
Written by Monica Horten   
Jul 14, 2010 at 12:20 AM

In spite of the cloak and dagger secrecy with which the European Commission is trying to shroud its ACTA negotiators, Trade Commissioner Karel de Grucht let slip a few nuggets of information on Tuesday  afternoon - including comments on 3-strikes measures.

 

Speaking in a hearing with the European Parliament's Civil Liberties committee, which was public, Commissioner De Grucht said that he did not expect much progress at the next round of the ACTA (Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement)  negotiations - which will be in Washington in late July.  And he further predicted that there was   unlikely to be movement on ACTA  before September.

The reason for the stalling is a difference of

opinion between the negotiating countries over the scope. Some want the ACTA to include  patents and designs, others want it to be ‘just' trade marks and copyright.

 

On the Internet issues, De Grucht was questioned heavily by  MEPs Stavros Lambrinidis and Jan Albrecht, (and one other whose name I did not quite catch).

 

Stavros  Lambrinidis, pointing out that the devil is in the detail, pressed Commissioner De Grucht on ISP liability. He expressed the concern that ACTA may not force a 3-strikes regime but does allow it, and that under such a regime, ISPs could be obligated to follow the downloading patterns of their users.

 

The answer from Commissioner De Grucht  was unexpected – and quite concerning. De Grucht acknowledged that a 3-strikes approach is not forbidden by ACTA, but that any implementation is down to Member State or EU law.  He further said that individual member states may adopt 3-strikes measures, citing France as his example. Then he went on to say “it is not excluded that the EU would adopt legislation in this respect and that would be material legislation”. 

From what I understand, the European Commission had shelved any such plans that it might have had in the wake of the Amendment 138 debate in the Telecoms Package. Unless this is a hint that something has changed.If that is the case, then it is in the public interest for it to be clarified. 

  De Grucht  also  claimed that ACTA is in line with the E-commerce directive - a view which would be difficult to substantiate if put to the test, and illustrating once  again how  DG Trade do not appear to understand the nature of the legal changes that ACTA could create.

 Jan Albrecht asked about the Telecoms Package final agreement, to which Commissioner De Grucht did not provide an answer.

 

A video of the European Parliament Civil Liberties (LIBE) session  on ACTA  is available via this link :


 

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) ACTA will stall until Autumn, says European Commissioner , http://www.iptegrity.com 14 July 2010 .  


User Comments
Please login or register to add comments

Last Updated ( Aug 15, 2010 at 09:34 PM )
<Previous   Next>

 "Any competent authority

 in charge of making

restrictions on  users'

Internet access, will have

to give users the

opportunity to

take part in a prior, fair

procedure, where the

principle of presumption

of innocence and right to

privacy are fully respected. 

Alejo Vidal Quadras,  MEP


Your Freedom to

 repeal the DE Act

 


La Quadrature du Net

La Quadrature du Net

Don't disconnect us!  

European Commission Creative Content Online consultation

AK Zensur

AK Vorrat

Open Rights Group

open rights group

Exgae

  Code

GetUp Action for Australia

 Campaign against Internet filtering in Australia

...AK Vorrat - against data retention

  AK vorrat